PortfoliosLab logo
^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^XCMP and ^NQROBO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^XCMP:

0.49

^NQROBO:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

^XCMP:

0.84

^NQROBO:

0.41

Omega Ratio

^XCMP:

1.12

^NQROBO:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

^XCMP:

0.51

^NQROBO:

0.11

Martin Ratio

^XCMP:

1.67

^NQROBO:

0.49

Ulcer Index

^XCMP:

7.38%

^NQROBO:

8.60%

Daily Std Dev

^XCMP:

25.99%

^NQROBO:

23.90%

Max Drawdown

^XCMP:

-35.83%

^NQROBO:

-44.12%

Current Drawdown

^XCMP:

-6.84%

^NQROBO:

-25.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XCMP achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than ^NQROBO's -2.01% return.


^XCMP

YTD

-2.71%

1M

9.24%

6M

-1.06%

1Y

11.51%

3Y*

19.43%

5Y*

15.85%

10Y*

15.13%

^NQROBO

YTD

-2.01%

1M

8.18%

6M

-5.53%

1Y

2.67%

3Y*

4.14%

5Y*

5.72%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XCMP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^XCMP is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

^NQROBO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^NQROBO is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^XCMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the ^NQROBO Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XCMP and ^NQROBO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Drawdowns

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XCMP drawdown since its inception was -35.83%, smaller than the maximum ^NQROBO drawdown of -44.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCMP and ^NQROBO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) is 5.56%, while Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that ^XCMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NQROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...