PortfoliosLab logo
^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^XCMP and ^NQROBO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
165.86%
43.52%
^XCMP
^NQROBO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^XCMP:

0.27

^NQROBO:

-0.16

Sortino Ratio

^XCMP:

0.55

^NQROBO:

-0.06

Omega Ratio

^XCMP:

1.08

^NQROBO:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

^XCMP:

0.28

^NQROBO:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

^XCMP:

0.96

^NQROBO:

-0.46

Ulcer Index

^XCMP:

7.04%

^NQROBO:

8.16%

Daily Std Dev

^XCMP:

25.09%

^NQROBO:

23.46%

Max Drawdown

^XCMP:

-35.83%

^NQROBO:

-44.12%

Current Drawdown

^XCMP:

-13.65%

^NQROBO:

-29.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XCMP achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than ^NQROBO's -8.23% return.


^XCMP

YTD

-9.81%

1M

-2.34%

6M

-5.81%

1Y

9.91%

5Y*

15.52%

10Y*

14.25%

^NQROBO

YTD

-8.23%

1M

-2.55%

6M

-4.73%

1Y

-1.63%

5Y*

6.17%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XCMP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^XCMP is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^XCMP is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

^NQROBO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^NQROBO is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^NQROBO is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^XCMP, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.50
^XCMP: 0.13
^NQROBO: -0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^XCMP, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00
^XCMP: 0.37
^NQROBO: -0.07
The chart of Omega ratio for ^XCMP, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.901.001.101.201.30
^XCMP: 1.05
^NQROBO: 0.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^XCMP, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.00
^XCMP: 0.14
^NQROBO: -0.10
The chart of Martin ratio for ^XCMP, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00
^XCMP: 0.47
^NQROBO: -0.47

The current ^XCMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the ^NQROBO Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XCMP and ^NQROBO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.13
-0.16
^XCMP
^NQROBO

Drawdowns

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XCMP drawdown since its inception was -35.83%, smaller than the maximum ^NQROBO drawdown of -44.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCMP and ^NQROBO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.65%
-29.80%
^XCMP
^NQROBO

Volatility

^XCMP vs. ^NQROBO - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (^NQROBO) at 14.06%. This indicates that ^XCMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NQROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.19%
14.06%
^XCMP
^NQROBO